Bitcoin VM - FAQ
Is Bitcoin VM Bitcoin?
No.
Bitcoin VM is not Bitcoin, and it does not claim to be.
Bitcoin refers to the Proof-of-Work network with its own consensus rules, monetary policy, and settlement guarantees. Bitcoin VM is a separate system that mirrors Bitcoin’s UTXO execution model while running under a different consensus mechanism.
Bitcoin remains unchanged.
Does Bitcoin VM modify or upgrade Bitcoin?
No.
Bitcoin VM:
Does not require a soft fork or hard fork
Does not change Bitcoin consensus
Does not change block times or issuance
Does not interact with Bitcoin Core
Bitcoin VM exists entirely outside Bitcoin.
Is this a Bitcoin sidechain or Layer 2?
No.
Bitcoin VM does not:
Settle to Bitcoin
Anchor state to Bitcoin
Use Bitcoin as a security or settlement layer
It is best described as a Bitcoin-style execution environment hosted on Metal Blockchain.
Why call it “Bitcoin VM” at all?
Because it mirrors Bitcoin’s execution and accounting model, not its consensus.
Bitcoin VM uses:
A UTXO-based transaction model
Bitcoin-like scripting semantics
Familiar transaction flows
The name reflects execution compatibility, not network authority.
Why Proof of Stake instead of Proof of Work?
Proof of Stake is used because Bitcoin VM is an execution environment, not a settlement layer.
Snowman Proof of Stake enables:
Sub-second finality
High throughput
Lower operational costs
Predictable execution guarantees
Bitcoin’s Proof of Work is optimized for global, objective settlement. Bitcoin VM optimizes for fast execution under different assumptions.
Is Proof of Stake “better” than Proof of Work?
No — it is different.
Proof of Work and Proof of Stake make different tradeoffs. Bitcoin VM does not attempt to replace or improve Bitcoin’s consensus model. It simply explores what Bitcoin-style execution looks like under Proof of Stake.
Does Bitcoin VM have a token?
No.
There is no new monetary asset introduced by Bitcoin VM itself.
There is no claim to monetary equivalence with bitcoin.
Does Bitcoin VM reduce Bitcoin’s security or miner incentives?
No.
Bitcoin VM operates independently and has no effect on Bitcoin miners, hash rate, or issuance. Bitcoin’s security model remains unchanged.
Is this meant for institutions or developers?
Both — carefully.
Developers benefit from:
Familiar UTXO semantics
Faster finality
Expressive execution
Institutions benefit from:
Deterministic settlement
Lower operational complexity
Clear consensus boundaries
Bitcoin VM is designed as infrastructure, not a consumer product.
Is Bitcoin VM open source?
Yes.
Bitcoin VM is released as open-source, experimental software.
The goal is transparency, reviewability, and long-term alignment — not lock-in.
Who should not use Bitcoin VM?
Bitcoin VM is not intended for:
Replacing Bitcoin
Acting as a global settlement layer
Applications requiring Bitcoin-level censorship resistance
Systems that depend on Proof of Work security assumptions
Those use cases belong on Bitcoin itself.
What is the goal of this project?
To explore a narrow question:
What does Bitcoin-style execution look like when separated from Proof of Work?
Bitcoin VM is one possible answer — published openly, with clear boundaries and no claims beyond what it can support.
Where is the code?
The initial public repository will be released soon.
The first release focuses on:
Core VM logic
UTXO handling
Snowman consensus integration
Reference implementation
Final Clarification
Bitcoin VM does not compete with Bitcoin.
Bitcoin does not need competition.
Bitcoin VM exists because experimentation belongs outside Bitcoin — not inside it.
.see also
Built by Metallicus in support of Bitcoin.



